Ahead of our recent match against West Brom, Steve Clarke
made some comments about KD’s signings beginning to settle and coming
good. There was some truth in what he was
saying, but more than anything it reminded me of an interview I heard with
Damien Comolli just before Christmas on TalkSport.
Often, newspapers and media outlets use the
same sources of information to saturation point, but this is one that might
have gone under the radar at the time so I thought I’d flag it up as there was
some interesting points.
Of course, as you’d expect for an unemployed man who’s
looking to get back into the game Comolli was generally talking up his
successes and spoke a lot about patience in football. On other subjects he spoke more candidly
though.
The transfer window may seem a long time ago now, but there
wasn’t a day at the time when Tom Ince’s name wasn’t being linked with us. Although he certainly fits the Rodgers profile
and the type of player we need – someone who can beat a man with pace and
trickery and find the back of the net (a la Suarez, Sturridge and hopefully
Countinho), many of us expressed reservations about the deal. Why take someone back when they’ve left. Or indeed why let him go in the first place?
Comolli said: “When I
arrived at the club Tom was at the end of his contract (in 2011). I met him and
his Dad. One of the first things I did.
And Roy was still in charge. Paul was concerned that the standard of
play at the club and the way the team was playing was not suited to Tom. Roy went.
From then on I think we made 4 or 5 contract offers to Tom that he kept
turning down. He didn’t feel it was the right place for him to stay and to play
his football. I think the last offer, we would have made him the highest paid
player underneath the first team, and to be fair to him I don’t think it was a
money issue”. Comolli went on to explain
that the deal reduced the fee for Charlie Adam, which was attractive given that
they didn’t have a choice – Ince wanted to leave and states “to keep our
interest there was a big sell-on”.
He then goes on to talk about the issue of over-playing
young players. Last month Jay flagged up
his surprise that Sterling was getting so much game time right here on this
blog. Perhaps Rodgers is a reader
because soon after Sterling was given a bit of a break from the action. How we’ve treated our young players over the
years is a concern. Is it a coincidence
that Michael Owen and Robbie Fowler were both practically finished by the age
of 25? Or was it our fault? Owen seems to think so, pointing accusations
recently, although he wasn’t begging to be dropped for Erik Meijer at the time.
The fitness issue reminded me of another good feature which
may have been missed by some of our fans a while back – a piece in the Daily
Express about the backroom staff at Melwood.
If accurate, one of the most concerning suggestions made in
the article was that Rodgers was told on arrival that it would be highly
unlikely he’d ever be able to play Johnson three times in a week, or that Agger
and Gerrard could handle back to back matches.
But instead of accepting this, LFC’s Head of Performance
Glen Driscoll has been charged with a new approach. Resting players is now deemed to be ‘old
hat’. If they’ve been rested it implies
that we’ve failed to look after them in the first place. The emphasis now is on tweaking the training
to keep players in the best possible condition.
Even down to a personal level if required. And that doesn’t mean giving players time
off, or dodging sessions, it means a whole planned approach to training based
on latest fitness and performance data.
Recovery from games is now given just as much attention as training for
games.
The stats are certainly impressive, especially for those
more ‘fragile’ players. Gerrard has already
made far more league appearances this season than in either of the past two
seasons (26, versus 18 and 21 respectively).
Without trying to curse him, should Agger make three more league
appearances this season it will be his highest league total ever for us. The full article can be read here.
I’m going to leave
you with a thought from the Comolli interview which is completely unrelated to
the rest of the post, but interesting nonetheless. He predicts a new golden era for two leagues
in Europe: England and Germany. He
sights the new Premier League TV deal which will come into effect next season,
and points out that on paper the team finishing 17th in the EPL will
have a higher turnover than the teams finishing
5th in France, Italy or Spain.
Written by 3s
Well, in theory keeping players fit all season long sounds terrific, but it's inferior to having more depth in the squad, so that the team can just be altered as is needed. You can't stop players from picking up injuries. While Agger, for example, may hit an all time high in appearances, he certainly hasn't been at his best in most of these games, which I would obviously prefer.
ReplyDeleteOn that last bit, I'm not sure whether England has a new "golden era" ahead, but Germany is certainly entering one right now.
PS: If you want more visitors, you should really rework the site. Not to be offensive, but this screams "I don't know how to do this". I'm 90% sure that most your visitors turn around on the spot, without ever reading your articles, just because of your background picture.
You're spot on about player performance, Agger on top form is more valuable than an underperforming but fit version. In an ideal world you'd have a decent sized squad of fit players so you could choose who is best suited to each match, if we can get the fitness part sorted then hopefully a good squad will follow. If we don't have to buy in numbers to cover injuries we can spend the money more selectively on a better quality of player.
ReplyDeleteCheers for the feedback on the site appearance, have been considering totally redoing the layout and colourscheme for a little while, might get stuck into that soon, always good to find out what people like and dislike about the site.